CourtMesh

DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs ANTRIX CORPORATION LIMITED

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 17 January 2022. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 22244/2021. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice V. Ramasubramanian.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed; winding-up orders upheld". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Companies Act, 2013, Companies Act, 1956 and Indian Contract Act, 1872. 19 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 22244/2021
Date of decision
Decision year2022
Bench
PetitionerDEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
RespondentANTRIX CORPORATION LIMITED
DisposalAppeals dismissed; winding-up orders upheld
Reportingreportable
Acts
Sections
  • Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 272(1)(e) of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 213(b) of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 224(2) of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Section 143(11), 143(12), 143(13) of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956
  • Section 243 of the Companies Act, 1956
  • Section 439(1)(f) of the Companies Act, 1956
  • Section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956
  • Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  • Section 17 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  • Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  • Section 255 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.