CourtMesh

NARINDER SINGH vs DIVESH BHUTANI

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 21 July 2022. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 29962/2013. The bench of 3 comprised Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court held that the lands covered by the special orders are 'forest land' under the 1…". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 29962/2013
Date of decision
Decision year2022
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
PetitionerNARINDER SINGH
RespondentDIVESH BHUTANI .
DisposalThe Court held that the lands covered by the special orders are 'forest land' under the 1980 Forest Act and directed au…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900
  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
  • Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887
  • Faridabad Complex (Development and Regulation) Act, 1971
  • National Capital Region Planning Board Act, 1985
Sections
  • Section 2
  • Section 3
  • Section 4
  • Section 5
  • Section 6
  • Section 7
  • Section 14
  • Section 27
  • Section 29
  • Section 35
  • Section 36
  • Section 37
  • Section 38
  • Section 39
  • Section 40
  • Section 41
  • Section 42
  • Section 43
  • Section 44
  • Section 45

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.