CourtMesh

SK NAUSAD RAHAMAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 10 March 2022. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 23430/2019. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Surya Kant, Justice Chief Justice and Justice Vikram Nath.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Circular declared invalid; existing rules and policies reaffirmed". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Constitution of India, Central Excise and Customs Act 1962 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017. 6 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 23430/2019
Date of decision
Decision year2022
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
PetitionerSK NAUSAD RAHAMAN
RespondentUNION OF INDIA
DisposalCircular declared invalid; existing rules and policies reaffirmed
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Constitution of India
  • Central Excise and Customs Act 1962
  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017
  • Recruitment Rules 2002
  • Recruitment Rules 2016
  • Right to Information Act 2005
  • Government of India (Transaction of Business Rules) 1961
  • Department of Revenue Circulars
  • Department of Personnel and Training Circulars
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016
Sections
  • Article 226 of the Constitution
  • Article 309 of the Constitution
  • Article 15(3)
  • Article 21
  • Section 4 of the Customs Act 1962
  • Section 4 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.