CourtMesh

STATE OF A.P vs A.P.STATE WAKF BOARD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 7 February 2022. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 15716/2012. The bench of 2 comprised Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Hemant Gupta.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court quashed the Errata notification and directed the land to vest with the State, e…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Wakf Act, 1954, Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013 and Abolition Regulation. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 15716/2012
Date of decision
Decision year2022
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
PetitionerSTATE OF A.P.
RespondentA.P.STATE WAKF BOARD .
DisposalThe Court quashed the Errata notification and directed the land to vest with the State, emphasizing procedural complian…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Wakf Act, 1954
  • Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2013
  • Abolition Regulation
  • Commutation Regulation
  • Inams Abolition Act
  • Enquiries Act, 1952
  • Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950
  • Hyderabad (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulation, 1358 Fasli
  • Hyderabad Jagirs (Commutation) Regulation, 1359 Fasli
  • Endowment Regulations, 1940
Sections
  • Section 4
  • Section 5
  • Section 6
  • Section 10
  • Section 13
  • Section 16
  • Section 27
  • Section 32
  • Section 40
  • Section 105
  • Section 114
  • Section 115
  • Section 121
  • Section 124
  • Section 132
  • Section 136
  • Section 137
  • Section 145
  • Section 146
  • Section 147

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.