CourtMesh

UNION OF INDIA vs M/S. GANPATI DEALCOM PVT. LTD. TTHROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 23 August 2022. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 2941/2020. The bench of 3 comprised Justice C.T. Ravikumar, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Chief Justice.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court declared Sections 3(2) and 5 of the 1988 Act unconstitutional from ince…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 28 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 2941/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2022
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PetitionerUNION OF INDIA
RespondentM/S. GANPATI DEALCOM PVT. LTD. TTHROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
DisposalThe Supreme Court declared Sections 3(2) and 5 of the 1988 Act unconstitutional from inception; held that the 2016 amen…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
  • Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • Income Tax Act, 1961
  • Indian Trusts Act, 1882
  • Law Commission Reports (57th, 130th)
Sections
  • Section 2(8)
  • Section 2(9)
  • Section 2(10)
  • Section 2(26)
  • Section 3
  • Section 4
  • Section 5
  • Section 6
  • Section 7
  • Section 8
  • Section 9
  • Section 24(1)
  • Section 24(3)
  • Section 24(4)
  • Section 24(5)
  • Section 26
  • Section 27
  • Section 28
  • Section 29
  • Section 53
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.