CourtMesh

ASSOCN. OF VASANTH APPTS. OWNERS vs V. GOPINANTH AND ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 13 February 2023. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 5053/2008. The bench of 2 comprised Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice K.M. Joseph.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed, rules upheld as valid". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Tamil Nadu Town & Country Planning Act, 1971, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 1994. 18 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 5053/2008
Date of decision
Decision year2023
Bench
  • HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
PetitionerASSOCN. OF VASANTH APPTS. OWNERS
RespondentV. GOPINANTH AND ORS.
DisposalAppeals dismissed, rules upheld as valid
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Tamil Nadu Town & Country Planning Act, 1971
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  • Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 1994
  • General Clauses Act, 1897
  • Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
  • Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966
  • Punjab Municipal Act, 1911
  • U.S. Constitution Fifth Amendment
Sections
  • Article 14
  • Article 300A
  • Section 9C
  • Section 17
  • Section 19
  • Section 20
  • Section 26
  • Section 28
  • Section 29
  • Sections 36 to 39
  • Sections 48 to 55
  • Section 122
  • Section 123
  • Section 124
  • Section 313 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act
  • List III Entry 42 of Seventh Schedule
  • Rule 19 of Development Control Rules (DCR)
  • Regulation 29 of Development Regulations, 2008

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.