CourtMesh

ICON EDUCATION SOCIETY vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 17 March 2023. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 5799/2021. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The appeal was dismissed; the provisions of the Act of 2007 were upheld as valid and cons…". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007 and National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004. 4 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 5799/2021
Date of decision
Decision year2023
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
PetitionerICON EDUCATION SOCIETY
RespondentTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
DisposalThe appeal was dismissed; the provisions of the Act of 2007 were upheld as valid and constitutional.
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007
  • National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004
Sections
  • Section 2(g) of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004
  • Section 4 of the Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007
  • Section 9 of the Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007
  • Section 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk Ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.