CourtMesh

IN RE INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 13 December 2023. Its neutral citation is 2023 INSC 1066. The bench of 7 comprised Justice Surya Kant, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Manoj Misra, Justice Chief Justice, Justice Chief Justice, Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Chief Justice.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court overruled the earlier decisions in SMS Tea Estates and Garware Wall Ropes, clar…". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and Indian Contract Act, 1872. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2023 INSC 1066
Diary numberDiary No. 40099/2022
Date of decision
Decision year2023
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PetitionerIN RE INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899.
DisposalThe Court overruled the earlier decisions in SMS Tea Estates and Garware Wall Ropes, clarified the law that unstamped o…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 & 1973
Sections
  • Section 33
  • Section 35
  • Section 36
  • Section 7
  • Section 11
  • Section 16
  • Section 42
  • Section 43
  • Section 49
  • Section 61
  • Section 62
  • Section 63
  • Section 65
  • Section 69
  • Section 70
  • Section 71
  • Section 72
  • Section 73
  • Section 74
  • Section 75

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.