CourtMesh

M/S N.N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S INDO UNIQUE FLAME LTD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 25 April 2023. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 23926/2020. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice K.M. Joseph, Justice Aniruddha Bose, Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice Ajay Rastogi.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court holds that non-stamped or insufficiently stamped arbitration agreements are not…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Indian Contract Act, 1872. 16 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 23926/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2023
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
PetitionerM/S N.N. GLOBAL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LIMITED
RespondentM/S INDO UNIQUE FLAME LTD.
DisposalThe Court holds that non-stamped or insufficiently stamped arbitration agreements are not non-existent or unenforceable…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Indian Stamp Act, 1899
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872
Sections
  • Section 11(6)
  • Section 11(6A)
  • Section 16
  • Section 33
  • Section 35
  • Section 42
  • Section 45
  • Section 7
  • Section 8
  • Section 17
  • Section 62
  • Section 79
  • Section 62
  • Section 63
  • Section 74
  • Section 76

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.