CourtMesh

SUDHIR VIKAS KALEL vs BAPU RAJARAM KALEL

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 7 February 2024. Its neutral citation is 2024 INSC 90. The bench of 2 comprised Justice K.V. Viswanathan and Justice Surya Kant.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (R…, Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 and Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. 11 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2024 INSC 90
Diary numberDiary No. 41796/2023
Date of decision
Decision year2024
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
PetitionerSUDHIR VIKAS KALEL
RespondentBAPU RAJARAM KALEL
DisposalAppeal dismissed; High Court judgment affirmed
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate…
  • Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959
  • Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961
  • Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965
Sections
  • Section 3
  • Section 4
  • Section 6
  • Section 10-1A
  • Section 30(1A)
  • Section 35
  • Rule 11
  • Rule 14
  • Rule 15
  • Rule 16
  • Rule 17

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.