TARSEM LAL vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT JALANDHAR ZONAL OFFICE

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment16 May 2024

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 16 May 2024. Its neutral citation is 2024 INSC 434. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice Abhay S. Oka.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Warrants against appellants canceled; appeals allowed subject to conditions". The record refers to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
Court	Supreme Court of India
Record type	Judgment
Neutral citation	2024 INSC 434
Diary number	Diary No. 53731/2023
Date of decision	16 May 2024
Decision year	2024
Bench	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
Petitioner	TARSEM LAL
Respondent	DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT JALANDHAR ZONAL OFFICE
Disposal	Warrants against appellants canceled; appeals allowed subject to conditions
Reporting	reportable
Acts	Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
Sections	Section 44(1)(b) Section 4 Section 19 Section 88 Section 89 Section 205 Section 70 Section 437 Section 204 Section 45(1) Section 65 Section 71 Section 170 Section 204(1) Section 204(2) Section 204(3) Section 204(4) Section 204(5) Section 88 Section 89

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Neutral citation: 2024 INSC 434, which also resolves at https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/citation/2024-insc-434
Court and date: Supreme Court of India, 16 May 2024
Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/supreme-court/2024/tarsem-lal-vs-directorate-of-enforcement-jalandhar-zonal-office-2024-363c6a

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

HeadnoteUnlocks with a free account

Key Facts

Legal Issues

Arguments Holding Legal Principles Case History with Orders Similar Cases Full judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
Every order and document on the record, ready to read
The full judgment exactly as the court published it
AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.