CourtMesh

ALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION vs RAHUL MEHRA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 19 September 2025. Its neutral citation is 2025 INSC 1131. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Atul S. Chandurkar and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court approved the new AIFF Constitution with modifications and directed the AIFF to…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them National Sports Development Code of India, 2011, FIFA Statutes and FIFA Standard Statutes 2005. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2025 INSC 1131
Diary numberDiary No. 35846/2017
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
PetitionerALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION
RespondentRAHUL MEHRA
DisposalThe Court approved the new AIFF Constitution with modifications and directed the AIFF to hold elections within four wee…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • National Sports Development Code of India, 2011
  • FIFA Statutes
  • FIFA Standard Statutes 2005
  • FIFA Statutes 2024
  • FIFA Statutes 2022
  • FIFA Statutes 2024 (amended)
Sections
  • Article 38(2)
  • Article 39(b)
  • Article 15(2)
  • Article 20.1
  • Article 20.9
  • Article 23
  • Article 25
  • Article 26.3
  • Article 73.1
  • Article 73.5
  • Section 4(1)(b)
  • Section 4(2)
  • Schedule III
  • Article 84
  • Article 84.1
  • Article 85
  • Article 11
  • Article 12
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 15.1

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues
LockedArgumentsLockedHoldingLockedLegal PrinciplesLockedCase History with OrdersLockedSimilar CasesLockedFull judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.