CourtMesh

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD vs DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY, COMMISSION

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 6 August 2025. Its neutral citation is 2025 INSC 937. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Atul S. Chandurkar and Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court disposed of the petitions and appeals with directions to ensure compliance with…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity (Amendment) Rules, 2024 and Electricity (Late Payment Surcharge) Rules, 2022. 12 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2025 INSC 937
Diary numberDiary No. 14553/2015
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
PetitionerBSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.
RespondentDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY, COMMISSION
DisposalThe Court disposed of the petitions and appeals with directions to ensure compliance with principles of timely liquidat…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Electricity Act, 2003
  • Electricity (Amendment) Rules, 2024
  • Electricity (Late Payment Surcharge) Rules, 2022
  • Delhi Electricity Reform Act, 2000
  • Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001
  • Delhi Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
  • Indian Electricity Act, 1910
  • Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998
Sections
  • Section 61
  • Section 62
  • Section 64
  • Section 65
  • Section 86
  • Section 111
  • Section 121
  • Section 176
  • Section 178
  • Section 180
  • Section 182
  • Section 183

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.