CourtMesh

M/S S.R.S TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKAR PROPRIETOR vs THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS FEDERATION NO. 6

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 6 February 2025. Its neutral citation is 2025 INSC 152. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Sanjay Karol, Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals allowed in part, appeals dismissed in part; delegation of permit powers upheld; 2…". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. 9 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2025 INSC 152
Diary numberDiary No. 26766/2011
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
PetitionerM/S S.R.S TRAVELS BY ITS PROPRIETOR K.T. RAJASHEKAR PROPRIETOR
RespondentTHE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION WORKERS FEDERATION NO. 6
DisposalAppeals allowed in part, appeals dismissed in part; delegation of permit powers upheld; 2003 Repeal Act held constituti…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
  • Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989
  • Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003
Sections
  • Section 2(7)
  • Section 2(40)
  • Section 68
  • Section 68(2)
  • Section 68(3)(b)
  • Section 68(5)
  • Section 96
  • Rule 56
  • Rule 56(1)(d)
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.