CRLA/161/2004 of DARSHAN SINGH vs STATE
High Court of UttarakhandCRLA
About this record
The High Court of Uttarakhand decided this matter on 11 May 2015. The registry identifies it as CNR UKHC010096302004. It was heard by Justice U. C. Dhyani.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "PARTLY ALLOWED".
Court record
| Court | High Court of Uttarakhand |
|---|---|
| Record type | CRLA |
| Case number | CNR UKHC010096302004 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2015 |
| Bench | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE U. C. DHYANI |
| Petitioner | DARSHAN SINGH |
| Respondent | STATE |
| Disposal | PARTLY ALLOWED |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: CNR UKHC010096302004
- Court and date: High Court of Uttarakhand, 11 May 2015
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/uttarakhand-high-court/2015/crla-161-2004-of-darshan-singh-vs-state-2015-3ba8df
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the High Court of Uttarakhand. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Uttarakhand data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.