CourtMesh

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORP. LTD vs NARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 28 November 2018. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 38586/2018. The bench of 2 comprised Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Ajay Rastogi.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The review petition was disposed of with liberty for the Trust to pursue remedies against…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2014, Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983 and Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995. 7 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 38586/2018
Date of decision
Decision year2018
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
PetitionerNATIONAL TEXTILE CORP. LTD.
RespondentNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD .
DisposalThe review petition was disposed of with liberty for the Trust to pursue remedies against the Union of India; contempt…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2014
  • Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983
  • Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995
  • Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Sections
  • Section 3(1) of the 1995 Act
  • Section 3(3) of the 1995 Act
  • Section 39 of the 1995 Act
  • Section 4 of the 1995 Act
  • Section 7(15) of the 1999 Act
  • Section 5(11) of the 1947 Act
  • Order XLVII of CPC

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.