CourtMesh

NARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD AND ORS vs O P SINGH AND ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 28 November 2018. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 38106/2014. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The review petition and contempt petition dismissed; decrees against NTC unenforceable; r…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2014, Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983 and Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995. 12 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 38106/2014
Date of decision
Decision year2018
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
PetitionerNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD AND ORS.
RespondentO P SINGH AND ORS.
DisposalThe review petition and contempt petition dismissed; decrees against NTC unenforceable; rights vested in Union of India…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Laws (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2014
  • Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983
  • Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995
  • Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
  • Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Sections
  • Section 3(1)
  • Section 3(3)
  • Section 4(7)
  • Section 4(8)
  • Section 4(9)
  • Section 38
  • Section 39
  • Section 105
  • Section 111
  • Section 116
  • Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
  • Section 7(15) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.