Contract lifecycle management for Indian legal teams.
Intake, drafting, playbook review, approvals, signature, and every obligation and renewal date after it. Plus the one thing a documents-only CLM cannot do: screen the counterparty against the Indian court record before you sign.
The lifecycle
Intake to renewal, in one place
Six stages, each of which is usually a different tool, a different spreadsheet or a calendar reminder somebody set once.
Intake and pipeline
A single queue for every agreement coming at the legal team, and a pipeline view of everything live. The question a general counsel is asked most often is what is outstanding and with whom, and this is the screen that answers it.
Draft from a template library
Standard templates on the entry tier, plus custom template creation from the professional tier, so the clauses your organisation has already settled on are the starting point rather than a document someone copied from the last deal.
AI clause extraction and playbook review
Extraction pulls the operative clauses out of an incoming draft and flags risk, missing clauses and non standard terms. Playbook review compares them against your own agreed positions and auto flags deviations, so a cap that exceeds your limit is caught before it reaches counsel.
Redlines and multi stage approval
Tracked changes on the document and a configurable multi stage approval rail with named reviewers, plus a counterparty portal so the other side is working on the same version rather than on an attachment from nine emails ago. Every step lands in the audit trail.
Obligation and renewal tracking
Signature is the middle of a contract's life, not the end. Date based obligation reminders on the entry tier, full obligation and SLA tracking from the professional tier, so an auto renewal does not arrive as a surprise.
Counterparty litigation screening
Screen the entity on the other side against the Indian court record for live and historic litigation and insolvency exposure, before you sign rather than after something goes wrong.
The difference
Most CLM tools have never heard of your counterparty
A contract platform built on documents alone knows what the agreement says. It knows nothing about who is signing it. So the standard process is that legal reviews the clauses, the business signs, and nobody finds out that the counterparty is carrying a winding up petition or a string of recovery suits until it matters.
Because My Agreements sits on the same platform as the Indian court record, screening is part of the contract workflow rather than a separate diligence exercise on a different tool weeks later. You screen the entity for live and historic litigation and insolvency exposure at the point the agreement is in front of you.
That screening carries the same honesty as the rest of the platform. A match is a court record bearing that name, scored with a confidence band rather than handed back as a bare hit, and a clean result means nothing matching surfaced in the corpus as filtered, not that the counterparty has no litigation anywhere. The mechanics are documented on the litigation check page.
Who it is for
Three buyers, one workflow
In-house legal teams
The pipeline view, the approval rail and obligation tracking exist because the recurring in-house problem is volume and visibility rather than difficulty. Counterparty screening answers the question the business actually asks, which is whether this company is worth contracting with.
Legal operations and procurement
Configurable multi stage approvals, a counterparty portal, an audit trail and analytics on contract cycle times and risk make the process auditable rather than anecdotal. Enterprise adds HRMS, CRM and ERP integration and full API access.
Law firms advising on contracts
Playbooks let a firm encode its own positions once and apply them consistently across clients and juniors, instead of the quality of a review depending on who happened to pick up the draft.
Honest limits
What this will not do for you
Including which capabilities sit behind which tier, so the evaluation is not a surprise.
- The entry tier caps contracts per month, offers standard templates only with basic clause extraction, exports to PDF only, and has no playbooks, no approval workflows and no counterparty portal.
- Playbooks, unlimited contracts, deep clause extraction, redlines, the counterparty portal and the audit trail start at the professional tier. API access and HRMS, CRM and ERP integrations are enterprise only.
- AI extracts, flags and compares. It does not approve, negotiate or execute anything on its own, and it will miss things a careful reader would catch. Every flag is for a human to decide on.
- Counterparty screening searches court records by name. Common personal and corporate names produce matches that are not your counterparty, and an absence of matches is not a clean record, only that nothing matching surfaced in the corpus as filtered.
- This is not an eBilling or outside counsel spend management platform, and it does not do multi currency legal spend. Enterprise legal management vendors who build only for that are better at it.
Related
Where to go next
FAQ
Contract lifecycle questions
Run one real agreement through it
Take a draft you are actually negotiating, load your playbook positions, and see what the review flags. Then screen the counterparty and see whether anything comes back.